Glennie v Independent Magazines (UK) Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 1611 (17 June 1999)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal was wrong to allow a new point of law to be raised on appeal after the matter had been determined on a preliminary jurisdictional issue on the basis presented by the applicant, who was represented by solicitors. There were no exceptional circumstances justifying the raising of the new point, and established principles required the appeal to be allowed.
- Citation
- [1999] EWCA Civ 1611
- Parties
- Respondent/applicant: Ms S. Glennie; Appellant/respondent: Independent Magazines (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Raising New Points on Appeal, Effective Date of Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms S. Glennie
Respondent/applicant
Independent Magazines (UK) Limited
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in law by permitting a new point of law on the effective date of termination to be raised on appeal when it was not raised or was conceded below
- 2 Whether justice required the new point to be allowed on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Appeal Tribunal was wrong to allow a new point of law to be raised on appeal after the matter had been determined on a preliminary jurisdictional issue on the basis presented by the applicant, who was represented by solicitors. There were no exceptional circumstances justifying the raising of the new point, and established principles required the appeal to be allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs; legal aid taxation of the respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment