Bari v London Borough Of Waltham Forest [2001] EWCA Civ 2064 (21 December 2001)
There was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's finding that the dismissal was on grounds of ill-health at the request of Mrs Bari, and the Council's procedures were properly followed. There was no real prospect of success on appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 2064
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Shamin Bari; Defendant/respondent: London Borough of Waltham Forest
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Application to Reinstate Appeal After Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Reinstatement of Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shamin Bari
Claimant/applicant
London Borough of Waltham Forest
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Application to Reinstate Appeal After Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding the dismissal fair and not wrongful
- 2 Whether the Council failed to establish the principal reason for dismissal
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider all circumstances in applying the statutory test of reasonableness
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's finding that the dismissal was on grounds of ill-health at the request of Mrs Bari, and the Council's procedures were properly followed. There was no real prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Refusal of adjournment
- Refusal to reinstate the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment