Roberts v Skelmersdale College
The Employment Tribunal acted within its discretion under rule 9(3) in dismissing Mr Roberts's claim for non-attendance, having considered the required documents and provided sufficient reasons. The Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in law by unduly restricting the Tribunal's discretion and imposing requirements not found in the rule.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Arthur David Roberts; Defendant/appellant: Skelmersdale College
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application for reinstatement refused.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure, Exercise of Discretion, Non Attendance, Appeal Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur David Roberts
Claimant/respondent
Skelmersdale College
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in dismissing the unfair dismissal claim for non-attendance under rule 9(3)
- 2 Whether the Tribunal gave adequate reasons for its decision
- 3 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal misapplied the discretion under rule 9(3)
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal acted within its discretion under rule 9(3) in dismissing Mr Roberts's claim for non-attendance, having considered the required documents and provided sufficient reasons. The Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in law by unduly restricting the Tribunal's discretion and imposing requirements not found in the rule.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application for reinstatement refused.
Orders
- Employment Appeal Tribunal's decision set aside; Tribunal's dismissal of unfair dismissal claim restored.
- Mr Roberts to pay Skelmersdale College's costs assessed at £7,000 plus VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment