Gerrard v Koby & Anor [2004] EWHC 1763 (Ch) (08 July 2004)

Gerrard v Koby & Anor [2004] EWHC 1763 (Ch) (08 July 2004)

The court found that Mr Gerrard had established unfairly prejudicial conduct by Mr Koby in relation to the purchase of the property, thereby conferring jurisdiction for relief under section 461. The circumstances warranted relief in principle, subject to a further hearing to determine the form of relief.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 1763 (Ch)
Parties
Petitioner: Michael Gerrard; First Respondent: Michael Koby; Second Respondent: Baumler (UK) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Companies Act 1985 S.459 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment on Liability and Entitlement to Relief; Further Hearing Required for Form of Relief
Outcome
Petition succeeds on liability; relief to be determined at further hearing.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Disputes, Fiduciary Duties, Section 459 Companies Act 1985, Relief Under Section 461
Company Law Unfair Prejudice Shareholder Disputes Fiduciary Duties Section 459 Companies Act 1985 Relief Under Section 461

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Gerrard

Petitioner

Michael Koby

First Respondent

Baumler (UK) Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under Companies Act 1985 S.459 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment on Liability and Entitlement to Relief; Further Hearing Required for Form of Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the affairs of Baumler (UK) Limited were conducted by Mr Koby in a manner unfairly prejudicial to Mr Gerrard's interests as a member under section 459(1) of the Companies Act 1985
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant relief under section 461 of the Companies Act 1985

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr Gerrard had established unfairly prejudicial conduct by Mr Koby in relation to the purchase of the property, thereby conferring jurisdiction for relief under section 461. The circumstances warranted relief in principle, subject to a further hearing to determine the form of relief.

Court Disposition

Petition succeeds on liability; relief to be determined at further hearing.

Orders

  • Further hearing to determine the form of relief under section 461 Companies Act 1985