Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards & Anor [2010] EWHC 3111 (Ch) (01 December 2010)
The statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under Companies Act 2006 s.994 is not inalienable and can be subject to an arbitration agreement. Where the dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement and the relief sought does not bind third parties or fall within public policy exceptions, the court must grant a stay of proceedings under Arbitration Act 1996 s.9.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 3111 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Fulham Football Club (1987) Limited; 1st Respondent: Sir David Richards; 2nd Respondent: The Football Association Premier League Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Application for Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.9
- Outcome
- Stay of proceedings granted under Arbitration Act 1996 s.9
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction of Court Vs Arbitration, Remedies Under Companies Act 2006 S.996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fulham Football Club (1987) Limited
Petitioner
Sir David Richards
1st Respondent
The Football Association Premier League Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Application for Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.9
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under Companies Act 2006 s.994 can be removed or diminished by contract via an arbitration agreement
- 2 Whether the disputes in the petition fall within the scope of the arbitration agreements in the FAPL Rules and FA Rules
- 3 Whether the relief sought is of a nature that can be granted by arbitrators
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under Companies Act 2006 s.994 is not inalienable and can be subject to an arbitration agreement. Where the dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement and the relief sought does not bind third parties or fall within public policy exceptions, the court must grant a stay of proceedings under Arbitration Act 1996 s.9.
Court Disposition
Stay of proceedings granted under Arbitration Act 1996 s.9
Orders
- Proceedings stayed to allow arbitration under the FAPL Rules and FA Rules
- Court to hear counsel on the precise form of order, permission to appeal, and costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment