Blunt v Jackson & Ors [2013] EWHC 2090 (Ch) (17 July 2013)
Mr Blunt was a shareholder entitled to 50 of the 100 shares in I Fit Global Limited, based on the agreement and conduct of the parties, and his exclusion from management constituted unfair prejudice under s.994 Companies Act 2006.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 2090 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mr Nigel Blunt; 1st Respondent: Ms Beverley Jackson; 2nd Respondent: Mr Ian Jackson; 3rd Respondent: I Fit Global Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Findings for the Petitioner on both preliminary issues: Mr Blunt is a shareholder and suffered unfair prejudice.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Rights, Rectification of Register, Quasi Partnership, Exclusion From Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nigel Blunt
Petitioner
Ms Beverley Jackson
1st Respondent
Mr Ian Jackson
2nd Respondent
I Fit Global Limited
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Blunt was a shareholder in I Fit Global Limited
- 2 Whether Mr Blunt suffered unfair prejudice under s.994 Companies Act 2006
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Blunt was a shareholder entitled to 50 of the 100 shares in I Fit Global Limited, based on the agreement and conduct of the parties, and his exclusion from management constituted unfair prejudice under s.994 Companies Act 2006.
Court Disposition
Findings for the Petitioner on both preliminary issues: Mr Blunt is a shareholder and suffered unfair prejudice.
Orders
- Declaration that Mr Blunt is entitled to 50 of the 100 shares in I Fit Global Limited.
- Permission for Mr Blunt to seek rectification of the register of members retrospectively.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment