George v McCarthy & Anor [2019] EWHC 2939 (Ch) (05 November 2019)

George v McCarthy & Anor [2019] EWHC 2939 (Ch) (05 November 2019)

The company was not a quasi-partnership; the relationship was governed by the Shareholders' Agreement and Articles. The conduct complained of did not amount to unfair prejudice under s.994. Petitioner voluntarily withdrew from management and was not entitled to return. No actionable exclusion, denial of information, manipulation, or failure to pursue acquisition opportunities was established. No relief under s.994 was warranted.

Citation
[2019] EWHC 2939 (Ch)
Parties
Petitioner: Richard George; First Respondent: Robert McCarthy; Second Respondent: Goss Interactive Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Petition dismissed; no relief granted.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Quasi Partnership, Shareholder Rights, Corporate Governance, Valuation of Shares
Company Law Equity Unfair Prejudice Quasi Partnership Shareholder Rights Corporate Governance Valuation of Shares

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard George

Petitioner

Robert McCarthy

First Respondent

Goss Interactive Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the company was a quasi-partnership
  2. 2 Whether conduct of respondents was unfairly prejudicial to petitioner under s.994
  3. 3 Whether petitioner was entitled to relief including buy-out and valuation of shares

Ratio Decidendi

The company was not a quasi-partnership; the relationship was governed by the Shareholders' Agreement and Articles. The conduct complained of did not amount to unfair prejudice under s.994. Petitioner voluntarily withdrew from management and was not entitled to return. No actionable exclusion, denial of information, manipulation, or failure to pursue acquisition opportunities was established. No relief under s.994 was warranted.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed; no relief granted.

Orders

  • Petition under s.994 Companies Act 2006 dismissed.
  • No order for buy-out or valuation of shares.