Smith v Smith & Anor [2022] EWHC 1035 (Ch) (06 May 2022)
The company was operated as a quasi-partnership with mutual understandings regarding Tim's participation and succession; Joan's exclusion of Tim without offering to purchase his shares at fair value was unfairly prejudicial under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, warranting an order for Joan to purchase Tim's shares at a fair value without minority discount.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1035 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Timothy Smith; First Respondent: Joan Smith; Second Respondent: Clive Smith (Oxford) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; order for purchase of shares
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Quasi Partnership, Shareholder Rights, Director Removal, Share Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Smith
Petitioner
Joan Smith
First Respondent
Clive Smith (Oxford) Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company was a quasi-partnership
- 2 Whether equitable restraints applied to Joan's exercise of majority rights
- 3 Whether Tim's exclusion without a fair offer for his shares was unfairly prejudicial
Ratio Decidendi
The company was operated as a quasi-partnership with mutual understandings regarding Tim's participation and succession; Joan's exclusion of Tim without offering to purchase his shares at fair value was unfairly prejudicial under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, warranting an order for Joan to purchase Tim's shares at a fair value without minority discount.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; order for purchase of shares
Orders
- Joan Smith to purchase Timothy Smith's 2,000 shares in Clive Smith (Oxford) Limited at a fair value without minority discount
- Valuation to be determined by expert evidence if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment