Lakey v Macabuag & Ors Re Mitt Wearables Ltd [2023] EWHC 1800 (Ch) (19 July 2023)

Lakey v Macabuag & Ors Re Mitt Wearables Ltd [2023] EWHC 1800 (Ch) (19 July 2023)

The court found that the removal of Mr Lakey as director and employee, and the consequent re-designation of his shares as a Bad Leaver, were effected in accordance with the Articles and Shareholders' Agreement. There was no actionable unfair prejudice as the process, though imperfect, was undertaken in good faith, with legal advice, and in the company's interests. The transfer of assets to Koalaa Limited was a bona fide commercial response to the breakdown in relations and the need for further investment, not a scheme to defeat Mr Lakey's rights. Mitt was not a quasi-partnership affording Mr Lakey rights beyond the formal agreements. The petition failed on all substantive grounds.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 1800 (Ch)
Parties
Petitioner: Benjamin Karl Lakey; First Respondent: Nathan Levi Ashley Jordan Macabuag; Second Respondent: Nicholas Everard Mellor; Third Respondent (discontinued): Hugh Seymour Wolley; Fourth Respondent: Mitt Wearables Limited; Fifth Respondent: Koalaa Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Liability Trial (excluding Share Valuation and Asset Transfer Valuation)
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Director Removal, Shareholder Rights, Quasi Partnership, Leaver Provisions, Fiduciary Duties, Asset Transfer, Employment Dismissal
Company Law Employment Law Unfair Prejudice Director Removal Shareholder Rights Quasi Partnership Leaver Provisions Fiduciary Duties +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 9 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamin Karl Lakey

Petitioner

Nathan Levi Ashley Jordan Macabuag

First Respondent

Nicholas Everard Mellor

Second Respondent

Hugh Seymour Wolley

Third Respondent (discontinued)

Mitt Wearables Limited

Fourth Respondent

Koalaa Limited

Fifth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Unfair Prejudice Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 / Liability Trial (excluding Share Valuation and Asset Transfer Valuation)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the affairs of Mitt Wearables Limited were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the interests of Benjamin Lakey as a member under s.994 Companies Act 2006
  2. 2 Whether the removal of Mr Lakey as director and employee and the re-designation of his shares as a Bad Leaver were valid and fair
  3. 3 Whether the transfer of assets and business to Koalaa Limited constituted unfair prejudice or breach of duty

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the removal of Mr Lakey as director and employee, and the consequent re-designation of his shares as a Bad Leaver, were effected in accordance with the Articles and Shareholders' Agreement. There was no actionable unfair prejudice as the process, though imperfect, was undertaken in good faith, with legal advice, and in the company's interests. The transfer of assets to Koalaa Limited was a bona fide commercial response to the breakdown in relations and the need for further investment, not a scheme to defeat Mr Lakey's rights. Mitt was not a quasi-partnership affording Mr Lakey rights beyond the formal agreements. The petition failed on all substantive grounds.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petition under s.994 Companies Act 2006 dismissed
  • No relief granted to the petitioner