Croly v Good & Ors

Croly v Good & Ors

The company had, by early 2006, become a quasi-partnership between Mr Croly and Mr Good, with an arrangement for equal participation in management and profits. Mr Croly's exclusion from management and the unequal/excessive drawings by Mr Good, as well as the failure to declare dividends, were unfairly prejudicial to Mr Croly's interests as a member. Relief by way of a buyout of Mr Croly's shares at a non-discounted value as at the date of his expulsion (9 November 2007) was appropriate, with the valuation to assume full recoverability of directors' loan accounts.

Parties
Petitioner: Christopher Croly; First Respondent: Robert Good; Second Respondent: Julia Good; Third Respondent: FP Mailing (Windsor) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Petition Under S 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Petition allowed; order for buyout of shares granted.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Quasi Partnership, Shareholder Remedies, Valuation of Shares, Directors' Duties
Company Law Unfair Prejudice Quasi Partnership Shareholder Remedies Valuation of Shares Directors' Duties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Croly

Petitioner

Robert Good

First Respondent

Julia Good

Second Respondent

FP Mailing (Windsor) Limited

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under S 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the affairs of FP Mailing (Windsor) Ltd were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to Mr Croly's interests as a member under s 994 Companies Act 2006
  2. 2 Whether the company was a quasi-partnership
  3. 3 Whether Mr Croly was entitled to be bought out at a non-discounted value and the appropriate valuation date

Ratio Decidendi

The company had, by early 2006, become a quasi-partnership between Mr Croly and Mr Good, with an arrangement for equal participation in management and profits. Mr Croly's exclusion from management and the unequal/excessive drawings by Mr Good, as well as the failure to declare dividends, were unfairly prejudicial to Mr Croly's interests as a member. Relief by way of a buyout of Mr Croly's shares at a non-discounted value as at the date of his expulsion (9 November 2007) was appropriate, with the valuation to assume full recoverability of directors' loan accounts.

Court Disposition

Petition allowed; order for buyout of shares granted.

Orders

  • Mr Good to purchase Mr Croly's shares at a non-discounted value as at 9 November 2007, with valuation to assume directors' loan accounts are fully recoverable.
  • Further directions to be given as necessary regarding the valuation process.