Profile Partners Ltd, Re
The court found that Mr Gott established a clear case that the Respondents were in threatened breach of contractual undertakings and company law principles by seeking to use company funds to defend the s. 994 petition and to pay consultancy invoices to Mr Hauge. There was no adequate apportionment of costs between defence and counterclaims, and the counterclaims appeared to be brought in response to the petition. Damages would not be an adequate remedy, and the balance of convenience and preservation of the status quo favoured granting injunctive relief.
- Parties
- Applicant/petitioner: Mr Michael Gott; First Respondent: Mr Rune Hauge; Second Respondent: Ms Lisa Davey; Third Respondent: Profile Sport and Media Limited; Fourth Respondent: Profile Holdings Limited; Fifth Respondent: Profile Partners Limited (England and Wales); Sixth Respondent: Profile Partners Limited (Guernsey); Seventh Respondent: Profile Partners GmbH & Co. KG; Eighth Respondent: Profile Partners Verwaltungsgesellschaft MBH; Ninth Respondent: Guernsey Resources Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under S. 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Injunctive relief granted in favour of the Petitioner.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Injunctions, Misuse of Corporate Funds, Shareholder Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Michael Gott
Applicant/petitioner
Mr Rune Hauge
First Respondent
Ms Lisa Davey
Second Respondent
Profile Sport and Media Limited
Third Respondent
Profile Holdings Limited
Fourth Respondent
Profile Partners Limited (England and Wales)
Fifth Respondent
Profile Partners Limited (Guernsey)
Sixth Respondent
Profile Partners GmbH & Co. KG
Seventh Respondent
Profile Partners Verwaltungsgesellschaft MBH
Eighth Respondent
Guernsey Resources Group Limited
Ninth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Under S. 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents are in threatened breach of contractual undertakings restricting use of company funds in shareholder litigation
- 2 Whether company funds may be used to defend or counterclaim in s. 994 proceedings
- 3 Whether payment of consultancy invoices to Mr Hauge would be improper and in breach of duty
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mr Gott established a clear case that the Respondents were in threatened breach of contractual undertakings and company law principles by seeking to use company funds to defend the s. 994 petition and to pay consultancy invoices to Mr Hauge. There was no adequate apportionment of costs between defence and counterclaims, and the counterclaims appeared to be brought in response to the petition. Damages would not be an adequate remedy, and the balance of convenience and preservation of the status quo favoured granting injunctive relief.
Court Disposition
Injunctive relief granted in favour of the Petitioner.
Orders
- Respondents restrained from using funds of the Fifth to Eighth Respondents to defend the Petition or pay disputed invoices pending trial.
- Respondents restrained from incurring expenditure on legal or other professional services for the purposes of the Petition, counterclaims, or any other aspect of the dispute.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment