Neil Worsley v Benjamin Gould & Ors

Neil Worsley v Benjamin Gould & Ors

Mr Gould breached the agreement and his statutory fiduciary duties by causing GML to continue trading and diverting assets and opportunities from the Company for his own benefit, including specific instances of misapplied stock and cash, without Mr Worsley's knowledge or consent. This conduct was outside the agreed basis for the joint venture and was unfairly prejudicial to Mr Worsley as a member. The case against Mrs Gould was not made out; she did not assist or receive assets with knowledge of any breach.

Parties
Petitioner: Neil Worsley; First Respondent: Benjamin Gould; Second Respondent: Gas Monkey Limited; Third Respondent: Drop The Hammer Limited; Fourth Respondent: Laura Gould
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Petition Under S. 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Liability Trial (split Trial; Remedy to Follow)
Outcome
Petition against Mrs Gould dismissed; findings of unfair prejudice and breach of duty against Mr Gould; remedies to be determined at a further trial.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Director's Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, Diversion of Assets, Shareholder Remedies
Company Law Insolvency Law Unfair Prejudice Director's Fiduciary Duties Conflict of Interest Diversion of Assets Shareholder Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neil Worsley

Petitioner

Benjamin Gould

First Respondent

Gas Monkey Limited

Second Respondent

Drop The Hammer Limited

Third Respondent

Laura Gould

Fourth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under S. 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair Prejudice) / Liability Trial (split Trial; Remedy to Follow)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Gould conducted the affairs of Drop The Hammer Limited in a manner unfairly prejudicial to Mr Worsley as a member
  2. 2 Whether Mr Gould breached his statutory fiduciary duties as director
  3. 3 Whether Mrs Gould dishonestly assisted or received assets in breach of duty

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Gould breached the agreement and his statutory fiduciary duties by causing GML to continue trading and diverting assets and opportunities from the Company for his own benefit, including specific instances of misapplied stock and cash, without Mr Worsley's knowledge or consent. This conduct was outside the agreed basis for the joint venture and was unfairly prejudicial to Mr Worsley as a member. The case against Mrs Gould was not made out; she did not assist or receive assets with knowledge of any breach.

Court Disposition

Petition against Mrs Gould dismissed; findings of unfair prejudice and breach of duty against Mr Gould; remedies to be determined at a further trial.

Orders

  • Petition against Laura Gould dismissed.
  • Further trial to determine remedy (if any) against Benjamin Gould.