Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards & Anor
The statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 is not inalienable and may be subject to an arbitration agreement. Where the dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement and the relief sought does not bind third parties or offend public policy, the court must stay proceedings in favour of arbitration under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Fulham Football Club (1987) Limited; 1st Respondent: Sir David Richards; 2nd Respondent: The Football Association Premier League Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Prejudice Petition / Arbitration Stay Application / First Instance Judgment on Stay Application
- Outcome
- Stay granted; proceedings stayed in favour of arbitration
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice Petitions, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals, Statutory Rights of Company Members
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fulham Football Club (1987) Limited
Petitioner
Sir David Richards
1st Respondent
The Football Association Premier League Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Prejudice Petition / Arbitration Stay Application / First Instance Judgment on Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 can be removed or diminished by contract (arbitration agreement)
- 2 Whether the dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration agreements in the FAPL and FA Rules
- 3 Whether the relief sought is of a kind that can be granted by arbitrators
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory right to present an unfair prejudice petition under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 is not inalienable and may be subject to an arbitration agreement. Where the dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement and the relief sought does not bind third parties or offend public policy, the court must stay proceedings in favour of arbitration under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Stay granted; proceedings stayed in favour of arbitration
Orders
- Stay of Fulham's unfair prejudice petition under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 to allow arbitration under the FAPL and FA Rules
- Encouragement to consolidate arbitrations and join interested clubs if Fulham consents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment