Elt v Orsler & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1226 (23 July 2001)

Elt v Orsler & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1226 (23 July 2001)

The trial was not unfair; the judge acted appropriately in managing the proceedings, gave the applicant latitude as a litigant in person, and was justified in his findings on primary liability and causation. There was no error in refusing adjournment or in the handling of evidence.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 1226
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Linda Joan Elt; Defendant/respondent: Andrew Orsler; Defendant/respondent: Moreton-in-Marsh District Agricultural and Horse Show Society
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Unfair Trial, Adjournment, Litigant in Person, Causation, Primary Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Linda Joan Elt

Claimant/applicant

Andrew Orsler

Defendant/respondent

Moreton-in-Marsh District Agricultural and Horse Show Society

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial was unfair due to the applicant's inability to secure legal representation and health issues
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in refusing adjournment or stay
  3. 3 Whether the judge misunderstood the applicant's case regarding the timing and cause of injury

Ratio Decidendi

The trial was not unfair; the judge acted appropriately in managing the proceedings, gave the applicant latitude as a litigant in person, and was justified in his findings on primary liability and causation. There was no error in refusing adjournment or in the handling of evidence.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused