Uren v First National Home Finance Ltd [2005] EWHC 2529 (Ch) (10 November 2005)
The claim fails because English law does not recognise a freestanding cause of action for unjust enrichment; the facts do not establish a sufficient nexus between the claimant's payments and the defendant's alleged enrichment; the enrichment was not at the expense of the claimant in law.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 2529 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Charles Uren; Defendant/appellant: First National Home Finance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim and Refusal of Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim struck out; summary judgment granted for defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, Limitation, Summary Judgment, Strike Out
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Uren
Claimant/respondent
First National Home Finance Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim and Refusal of Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a freestanding claim for unjust enrichment exists in English law
- 2 Whether the defendant was enriched at the expense of the claimant
- 3 Whether the claim is statute barred
Ratio Decidendi
The claim fails because English law does not recognise a freestanding cause of action for unjust enrichment; the facts do not establish a sufficient nexus between the claimant's payments and the defendant's alleged enrichment; the enrichment was not at the expense of the claimant in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim struck out; summary judgment granted for defendant.
Orders
- Claim struck out
- Summary judgment entered for defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment