Uren v First National Home Finance Ltd
The claim fails because the pleaded facts do not bring the case within any established category of unjust enrichment or any justifiable extension thereof; there is no sufficient legal nexus between the claimant's payments and the defendant's alleged enrichment; any possible cause of action is statute-barred.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Charles Uren; Defendant/appellant: First National Home Finance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From District Judge's Refusal to Strike Out Claim and Refusal to Grant Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Enrichment, Summary Judgment, Limitation of Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Uren
Claimant/respondent
First National Home Finance Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From District Judge's Refusal to Strike Out Claim and Refusal to Grant Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claim for unjust enrichment exists as a freestanding cause of action under English law
- 2 Whether the pleaded facts establish enrichment at the expense of the claimant
- 3 Whether the claim is statute-barred
Ratio Decidendi
The claim fails because the pleaded facts do not bring the case within any established category of unjust enrichment or any justifiable extension thereof; there is no sufficient legal nexus between the claimant's payments and the defendant's alleged enrichment; any possible cause of action is statute-barred.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim struck out.
Orders
- Action dismissed or struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment