O'Neil v Gale
Mrs Gale, by providing and permitting the use of her bank and Betfair accounts for the implementation of Mr Gale's unlawful collective investment scheme, aided the commission of criminal offences under sections 19 and 23 of FSMA. As a wrongdoer, she could not rely on the change of position defence to resist restitution.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Kathleen Margaret O’Neil; Defendant/appellant: Faye Gale
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Enrichment, Change of Position Defence, Illegality, Aiding and Abetting, Collective Investment Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kathleen Margaret O’Neil
Claimant/respondent
Faye Gale
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Gale aided the commission of a criminal offence under sections 19 and 23 of FSMA by providing account facilities to Mr Gale
- 2 Whether Mrs Gale could rely on the change of position defence in an unjust enrichment claim
- 3 Whether the absence of specific pleadings inhibited the finding of wrongdoing
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Gale, by providing and permitting the use of her bank and Betfair accounts for the implementation of Mr Gale's unlawful collective investment scheme, aided the commission of criminal offences under sections 19 and 23 of FSMA. As a wrongdoer, she could not rely on the change of position defence to resist restitution.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment