Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd

Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd

The appeal was allowed because the Employment Tribunal's decision was based on an incorrect understanding of the law, as clarified by the European Court of Justice. The case must be reheard with the correct legal principles applied. The successful appellant is entitled to costs.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Clarke; Defendant/respondent: Frank Staddon Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 October 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Unpaid Holiday Pay, Working Time Directive, Costs on Appeal
Employment Law European Union Law Unpaid Holiday Pay Working Time Directive Costs on Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clarke

Claimant/appellant

Frank Staddon Ltd

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal applied the correct legal principles regarding unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Directive
  2. 2 Whether the fact-finding exercise was deficient due to a misapprehension of the law
  3. 3 Entitlement to costs following a successful appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the Employment Tribunal's decision was based on an incorrect understanding of the law, as clarified by the European Court of Justice. The case must be reheard with the correct legal principles applied. The successful appellant is entitled to costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal and Employment Tribunal set aside
  • Case remitted to the London Central Employment Tribunal for rehearing