FGP v Serco Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin) (05 July 2012)
The maintenance of restraints throughout the claimant's inpatient hospital stay between 15 and 23 July 2010 was disproportionate and failed to consider the necessity during treatment, resulting in a breach of Article 3 ECHR. The guidance issued by the Secretary of State was insufficiently precise and failed to require specific assessment of restraint during treatment, creating an unacceptable risk of breach.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: FGP; 1st Defendant: Serco PLC; 2nd Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Use of Restraints, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Detention, Proportionality, Guidance on Restraints
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FGP
Claimant
Serco PLC
1st Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of restraints during hospital visits breached Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the guidance issued by the Secretary of State creates an unacceptable risk of unlawful restraint
Ratio Decidendi
The maintenance of restraints throughout the claimant's inpatient hospital stay between 15 and 23 July 2010 was disproportionate and failed to consider the necessity during treatment, resulting in a breach of Article 3 ECHR. The guidance issued by the Secretary of State was insufficiently precise and failed to require specific assessment of restraint during treatment, creating an unacceptable risk of breach.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed
Orders
- Declaration that Article 3 ECHR was breached during inpatient hospital stay between 15 and 23 July 2010
- Anonymity order granted for claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment