HM Revenue & Customs v Dunwood Travel Ltd
The three year limitation period in section 77(1)(a) VATA applies to the prescribed accounting period in which the annual adjustment under TOMS is made (the fifth quarter), not to the earlier quarters to which the adjustment relates. Therefore, the assessment for period 6/01 was within time.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE & CUSTOMS; Appellant/defendant: DUNWOOD TRAVEL LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Statutory Interpretation, Limitation Periods, Tour Operators Margin Scheme (toms)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE & CUSTOMS
Respondent/claimant
DUNWOOD TRAVEL LIMITED
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the three year limitation in section 77(1)(a) of the VAT Act 1994 applies to the prescribed accounting period in which the annual adjustment under TOMS is made, or to the earlier periods to which the adjustment relates.
Ratio Decidendi
The three year limitation period in section 77(1)(a) VATA applies to the prescribed accounting period in which the annual adjustment under TOMS is made (the fifth quarter), not to the earlier quarters to which the adjustment relates. Therefore, the assessment for period 6/01 was within time.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- HMRC's amended 24 June 2004 assessment for period 6/01 in the sum of £17,260.85 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment