Littlewoods Ltd & Ors v HM Revenue and Customs [2015] EWCA Civ 515 (21 May 2015)
Sections 78 and 80 of VATA 1994 provide an exclusive statutory scheme for the repayment of overpaid VAT and the payment of interest, thereby excluding common law restitutionary claims for both principal and interest. The statutory scheme does not violate the EU law principle of effectiveness, as the simple interest paid under section 78 constitutes an adequate indemnity for the loss occasioned by the undue payment of VAT. The exclusion of restitutionary claims is therefore valid under both English and EU law.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 515
- Parties
- Respondents/claimants: Littlewoods Limited and others; Appellants/defendants: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal by HMRC allowed; cross-appeal by Littlewoods dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Overpayment, Restitutionary Claims, Interest on Overpaid Tax, Statutory Exclusion of Common Law Remedies, EU Law Effectiveness Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Littlewoods Limited and others
Respondents/claimants
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
Appellants/defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Littlewoods' restitution claims for overpaid VAT are excluded by sections 78 and 80 of VATA 1994 as a matter of English law
- 2 Whether such exclusion is contrary to EU law, specifically the principle of effectiveness
- 3 If exclusion is contrary to EU law, whether VATA 1994 can be construed to conform with EU law or must be disapplied
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 78 and 80 of VATA 1994 provide an exclusive statutory scheme for the repayment of overpaid VAT and the payment of interest, thereby excluding common law restitutionary claims for both principal and interest. The statutory scheme does not violate the EU law principle of effectiveness, as the simple interest paid under section 78 constitutes an adequate indemnity for the loss occasioned by the undue payment of VAT. The exclusion of restitutionary claims is therefore valid under both English and EU law.
Court Disposition
Appeal by HMRC allowed; cross-appeal by Littlewoods dismissed.
Orders
- Littlewoods' restitution claims for compound interest are excluded by sections 78 and 80 VATA 1994 as a matter of English law.
- The exclusion is not contrary to EU law; the statutory scheme provides an adequate indemnity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment