Littlewoods Limited and others v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Sections 78 and 80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 create a comprehensive statutory regime for repayment of overpaid VAT and interest, which impliedly excludes concurrent common law claims for compound interest. EU law does not require the UK to pay compound interest or full reimbursement of the use value of money; the provision of simple interest under national law is sufficient provided it does not deprive the taxpayer of an adequate indemnity, which in this case it does not.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Littlewoods Limited and others; Appellant/respondent: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal by HMRC allowed; cross-appeal by Littlewoods dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Overpayment, Unjust Enrichment, Interest on Tax Repayments, Limitation Periods, EU Law Effectiveness and Equivalence, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Littlewoods Limited and others
Appellant/respondent
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether common law claims for compound interest on overpaid VAT are excluded by sections 78 and 80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 as a matter of English law
- 2 Whether EU law requires the UK to pay compound interest (or more than simple interest) on overpaid VAT to provide an adequate indemnity for taxpayers
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 78 and 80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 create a comprehensive statutory regime for repayment of overpaid VAT and interest, which impliedly excludes concurrent common law claims for compound interest. EU law does not require the UK to pay compound interest or full reimbursement of the use value of money; the provision of simple interest under national law is sufficient provided it does not deprive the taxpayer of an adequate indemnity, which in this case it does not.
Court Disposition
Appeal by HMRC allowed; cross-appeal by Littlewoods dismissed.
Orders
- Littlewoods’ claims for compound interest are excluded as a matter of English law and not required by EU law.
- Parties invited to lodge written submissions on the appropriate form of order within 21 days if no agreement is reached.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment