Revenue & Customs v Premier Foods Ltd. [2007] EWHC 3134 (Ch) (24 October 2007)
The Tribunal erred in law by misapplying the context and meaning of 'confectionery', wrongly requiring cooking and added sweetening matter as essential elements, and failing to interpret the term according to its ordinary meaning within the statutory context of VAT Act 1994 Schedule 8, Part 2, Group 1, excepted Item 2 and Note 5.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 3134 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: HM Revenue & Customs; Defendant/appellant: Premier Foods Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / High Court Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision set aside
- Legal Topics
- VAT Zero Rating, Definition of Confectionery, Schedule 8 VAT Act 1994
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Revenue & Customs
Claimant/respondent
Premier Foods Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / High Court Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hartley's Fruit Bars are 'confectionery' for VAT purposes under Schedule 8, Part 2, Group 1, excepted Item 2 and Note 5 of the VAT Act 1994
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in its interpretation of 'confectionery'
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by misapplying the context and meaning of 'confectionery', wrongly requiring cooking and added sweetening matter as essential elements, and failing to interpret the term according to its ordinary meaning within the statutory context of VAT Act 1994 Schedule 8, Part 2, Group 1, excepted Item 2 and Note 5.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision set aside
Orders
- Matter remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for fresh determination
- Costs awarded to HMRC
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment