Shanning International Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc & Ors [2000] EWCA Civ 177 (25 May 2000)
Council Regulation 3541/92 is valid and of permanent effect because it was adopted for the legitimate Community objective of avoiding distortion of competition through uniform implementation of UN sanctions, and all substantive and procedural requirements under the EEC Treaty were met. The costs order was within the trial judge's discretion given the neutral position of Lloyds and the real dispute being between Shanning and Rasheed.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 177
- Parties
- Claimant: Shanning; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Lloyds Bank; Defendant/part 20 Defendant/appellant: Rasheed Bank
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial of Preliminary Issues and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of EU Regulations, Sanctions Enforcement, Distortion of Competition, Procedural Requirements Under EU Law, Interpretation of EU Regulations, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shanning
Claimant
Lloyds Bank
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Rasheed Bank
Defendant/part 20 Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial of Preliminary Issues and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Council Regulation 3541/92 is valid under the EEC Treaty
- 2 Whether the Regulation is of permanent effect or temporary
- 3 Whether the Regulation was adopted for a legitimate Community objective or for foreign/security policy reasons
Ratio Decidendi
Council Regulation 3541/92 is valid and of permanent effect because it was adopted for the legitimate Community objective of avoiding distortion of competition through uniform implementation of UN sanctions, and all substantive and procedural requirements under the EEC Treaty were met. The costs order was within the trial judge's discretion given the neutral position of Lloyds and the real dispute being between Shanning and Rasheed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Rasheed's appeal dismissed with costs
- Shanning's appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment