Secretary of State for the Home Department v Ahmadi [2013] EWCA Civ 512 (09 May 2013)
A removal decision under section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 cannot be validly made contemporaneously with a variation decision; notice of the variation decision must first be given, as an application is not 'decided' until such notice is served. The statutory scheme and regulations require this sequence, and there is no ambiguity permitting a different construction.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 512
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Respondent/appellant: Javad Ahmadi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From Upper Tribunal (immigration and Asylum Chamber)
- Outcome
- Secretary of State's appeal dismissed; Mr. Ahmadi's appeal allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Removal Decisions Under Section 47, Timing and Notification of Immigration Decisions, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions on Leave to Remain and Removal, Appeal Rights Under Immigration Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Appellant/respondent
Javad Ahmadi
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From Upper Tribunal (immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a removal decision under section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 can be made contemporaneously with a variation decision
- 2 Whether notice of the variation decision must be given before a valid removal decision can be made under section 47
- 3 Interpretation of section 3C(2)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971 and related regulations
Ratio Decidendi
A removal decision under section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 cannot be validly made contemporaneously with a variation decision; notice of the variation decision must first be given, as an application is not 'decided' until such notice is served. The statutory scheme and regulations require this sequence, and there is no ambiguity permitting a different construction.
Court Disposition
Secretary of State's appeal dismissed; Mr. Ahmadi's appeal allowed in part.
Orders
- Mr. Ahmadi's appeal against the variation decision is dismissed.
- Mr. Ahmadi's appeal against the removal decision is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment