Revenue & Customs v Premier Foods Ltd.

Revenue & Customs v Premier Foods Ltd.

The Tribunal erred in law by applying an irrelevant statutory context, by requiring added sweetening matter and a cooking process for classification as 'confectionery', and by misinterpreting the statutory language. The matter must be remitted for reconsideration under the correct legal principles.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: HM Revenue & Customs; Defendant/appellant: Premier Foods Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; matter remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for reconsideration; costs awarded to appellant.
Legal Topics
Value Added Tax, Statutory Interpretation, Confectionery Definition
Tax Law Value Added Tax Statutory Interpretation Confectionery Definition

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HM Revenue & Customs

Claimant/respondent

Premier Foods Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Hartley’s Fruit Bars are 'confectionery' for the purposes of VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8, Part 2, Group 1, excepted Item 2 and Note 5
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in its interpretation of 'confectionery'

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal erred in law by applying an irrelevant statutory context, by requiring added sweetening matter and a cooking process for classification as 'confectionery', and by misinterpreting the statutory language. The matter must be remitted for reconsideration under the correct legal principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; matter remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for reconsideration; costs awarded to appellant.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Matter remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for fresh determination