ET v JP & Ors [2018] EWHC 685 (Ch) (28 March 2018)
Section 1(3) of the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 does not require referral to the Court of Protection where a minor beneficiary's incapacity to assent arises solely from infancy, even if mental impairment is present; the High Court retains jurisdiction to determine benefit for minor beneficiaries.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 685 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: E. T.; Defendants: J. P. and Others; Interested Parties: Minor Beneficiaries; Interested Parties: Trustees
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Variation of Trusts Act Application / Judgment on Preliminary Legal Issue
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trusts, Court of Protection Jurisdiction, Minor Beneficiaries, Mental Capacity Act 2005
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. T.
Claimant
J. P. and Others
Defendants
Minor Beneficiaries
Interested Parties
Trustees
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Variation of Trusts Act Application / Judgment on Preliminary Legal Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 1(3) of the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 require the question of benefit for a minor beneficiary with mental incapacity to be determined by the Court of Protection rather than the High Court?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 1(3) of the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 does not require referral to the Court of Protection where a minor beneficiary's incapacity to assent arises solely from infancy, even if mental impairment is present; the High Court retains jurisdiction to determine benefit for minor beneficiaries.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Court approves the proposed variation of the trust for all persons on whose behalf approval was required
- No referral to the Court of Protection necessary for minor beneficiary X
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment