Williams v Sherborne Corporate Services Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 407 (Ch) (28 February 2025)
The Public Trustee is the current trustee of the IXG Schemes, the assets in question are trust assets, and the Former Trustees and their nominee have no entitlement to retain them by way of lien or security. The Deeds of Assignment were by way of security only, not absolute assignments. The Guernsey court's Unless Order determined the value of any claims or liabilities of the Former Trustees at nil due to non-compliance, extinguishing any right to indemnity or security. The IXG Schemes have not ceased to exist for lack of section 150 approval. The Public Trustee is entitled to vesting orders or declarations over all disputed assets.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 407 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Williams (in his capacity as the Public Trustee of the Bailiwick of Guernsey); First Defendant: Sherborne Corporate Services Limited; Second Defendant: Kenilworth Consultants Inc; Third Defendant: Temple Pension and Investments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (vesting Orders) / Final Disposal Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Vesting orders and declarations granted in favour of the Public Trustee.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Orders, Trustee Removal and Appointment, Trust Asset Recovery, Trustee Indemnity, Lien and Security Over Trust Assets, Self Dealing Rule, Guernsey Trust Law, Section 150 Approval (guernsey), Constructive Trusts, Res Judicata
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Williams (in his capacity as the Public Trustee of the Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Claimant
Sherborne Corporate Services Limited
First Defendant
Kenilworth Consultants Inc
Second Defendant
Temple Pension and Investments Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (vesting Orders) / Final Disposal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Public Trustee is entitled to vesting orders or declarations over the disputed assets as trustee of the IXG Schemes
- 2 Whether the Deeds of Assignment executed by the Former Trustees were absolute assignments or security only
- 3 Whether the Former Trustees or their nominees are entitled to retain trust assets by way of lien or security for alleged liabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The Public Trustee is the current trustee of the IXG Schemes, the assets in question are trust assets, and the Former Trustees and their nominee have no entitlement to retain them by way of lien or security. The Deeds of Assignment were by way of security only, not absolute assignments. The Guernsey court's Unless Order determined the value of any claims or liabilities of the Former Trustees at nil due to non-compliance, extinguishing any right to indemnity or security. The IXG Schemes have not ceased to exist for lack of section 150 approval. The Public Trustee is entitled to vesting orders or declarations over all disputed assets.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Vesting orders and declarations granted in favour of the Public Trustee.
Orders
- Immediate vesting orders or declarations in favour of the Public Trustee in relation to all real property assets and all investment portfolio accounts, including those subject to the Deeds of Assignment.
- Defendants to execute all necessary documents to effect transfer or vesting of assets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment