Glyn (t/a Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery) v McGarel-Groves & Ors [2005] EWHC 1629 (QB) (23 July 2005)
Both Mr Glyn and Msr. Grandiere were found negligent. Msr. Grandiere administered excessive and unjustified doses of cortico-steroids (Kenacort 80 and Voren suspension) to Anna, causing laminitis and her subsequent destruction. Mr Glyn, as Anna's regular vet present at the treatment, owed a duty to intervene or at least to ascertain the drugs and dosages being administered; his failure to do so was a breach of duty. Mrs McGarel-Groves was not warned of the risk of laminitis, and had she been warned, she would not have consented. Causation was established and damages awarded for the agreed value of Anna.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1629
- Parties
- Claimant and First Part 20 Defendant (1st Claim): Philip John Glyn (t/a Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery); Defendant and Part 20 Claimant (1st Claim): Jane McGarel-Groves; Second Part 20 Defendant (1st Claim) and Part 20 Claimant (2nd Claim): Erik Grandiere; Part 20 Defendant (2nd Claim): Clinique Veterinaire Equine De Chantilly
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Negligence (veterinary Malpractice) / High Court Trial, Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for Mrs McGarel-Groves against Mr Glyn and Msr. Grandiere; indemnity as between Msr. Grandiere and the Clinique per settlement.
- Legal Topics
- Veterinary Malpractice, Duty of Care, Causation, Informed Consent, Damages for Loss of Animal, Indemnity Between Professionals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip John Glyn (t/a Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery)
Claimant and First Part 20 Defendant (1st Claim)
Jane McGarel-Groves
Defendant and Part 20 Claimant (1st Claim)
Erik Grandiere
Second Part 20 Defendant (1st Claim) and Part 20 Claimant (2nd Claim)
Clinique Veterinaire Equine De Chantilly
Part 20 Defendant (2nd Claim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence (veterinary Malpractice) / High Court Trial, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Glyn and/or Msr. Grandiere were negligent in the treatment of Anna on 18 May 2001
- 2 Whether Mrs McGarel-Groves was adequately warned of the risks of laminitis
- 3 Whether the administration of cortico-steroids was clinically justified and reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
Both Mr Glyn and Msr. Grandiere were found negligent. Msr. Grandiere administered excessive and unjustified doses of cortico-steroids (Kenacort 80 and Voren suspension) to Anna, causing laminitis and her subsequent destruction. Mr Glyn, as Anna's regular vet present at the treatment, owed a duty to intervene or at least to ascertain the drugs and dosages being administered; his failure to do so was a breach of duty. Mrs McGarel-Groves was not warned of the risk of laminitis, and had she been warned, she would not have consented. Causation was established and damages awarded for the agreed value of Anna.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Mrs McGarel-Groves against Mr Glyn and Msr. Grandiere; indemnity as between Msr. Grandiere and the Clinique per settlement.
Orders
- Mr Glyn and Msr. Grandiere to pay damages of £350,000 to Mrs McGarel-Groves for the loss of Anna.
- Interest on veterinary fees of £4,778.91 awarded to Mr Glyn (undisputed).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment