Gravil v Carroll & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 689 (18 June 2008)
The assault was so closely connected with the employment as a rugby player that it is fair and just to hold the club vicariously liable; the punch occurred during a melée that was an ordinary incident of the game and thus of the employment, and the contract expressly contemplated such risks and liability.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 689
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Andrew Gravil; First Defendant: Richard Carroll; Second Defendant/respondent: Redruth Rugby Football Club
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal From Queen's Bench Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Battery, Employer's Liability, Intentional Torts, Sports Injuries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Gravil
Claimant/appellant
Richard Carroll
First Defendant
Redruth Rugby Football Club
Second Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal From Queen's Bench Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Redruth Rugby Football Club is vicariously liable for the tortious assault committed by its employee, Richard Carroll, during a rugby match.
Ratio Decidendi
The assault was so closely connected with the employment as a rugby player that it is fair and just to hold the club vicariously liable; the punch occurred during a melée that was an ordinary incident of the game and thus of the employment, and the contract expressly contemplated such risks and liability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Redruth Rugby Football Club held vicariously liable for the assault committed by Richard Carroll.
- Judgment for the claimant against the club for damages assessed at £8,500.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment