Biffa Waste Services Ltd & Anor v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1257 (12 November 2008)

Biffa Waste Services Ltd & Anor v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1257 (12 November 2008)

Outokumpu Wenmac AB was not vicariously liable for the negligence of Pickfords' employees as borrowed employees because OT did not exercise control over the manner of their work, and Pickfords' welders remained independent contractors. However, OT was liable for the negligence of Pickfords under the ultra-hazardous activity rule, as welding and grinding in the presence of combustible material constituted inherently dangerous operations imposing a non-delegable duty.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Civ 1257
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Biffa Waste Services Limited; Claimant/respondent: Biffa Leicester Limited; First Defendant: Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GMBH; Second Defendant/appellant: Outokumpu Wenmac AB; Third Party: Vanguard Industrial Ltd t/a Pickfords Vanguard; Fourth Party: Hese Umwelt GmBH
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; vicarious liability finding reversed, ultra-hazardous liability affirmed.
Legal Topics
Vicarious Liability, Non Delegable Duties, Negligence, Ultra Hazardous Activities, Independent Contractor Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Biffa Waste Services Limited

Claimant/respondent

Biffa Leicester Limited

Claimant/respondent

Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GMBH

First Defendant

Outokumpu Wenmac AB

Second Defendant/appellant

Vanguard Industrial Ltd t/a Pickfords Vanguard

Third Party

Hese Umwelt GmBH

Fourth Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Is Outokumpu Wenmac AB vicariously liable for the negligence of Pickfords' employees as borrowed employees?
  2. 2 Is Outokumpu Wenmac AB liable for the negligence of its independent contractor under the ultra-hazardous activity rule?

Ratio Decidendi

Outokumpu Wenmac AB was not vicariously liable for the negligence of Pickfords' employees as borrowed employees because OT did not exercise control over the manner of their work, and Pickfords' welders remained independent contractors. However, OT was liable for the negligence of Pickfords under the ultra-hazardous activity rule, as welding and grinding in the presence of combustible material constituted inherently dangerous operations imposing a non-delegable duty.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; vicarious liability finding reversed, ultra-hazardous liability affirmed.

Orders

  • Judgment for claimants against Outokumpu Wenmac AB for damages to be assessed under ultra-hazardous activity liability.
  • No vicarious liability for Outokumpu Wenmac AB regarding Pickfords' employees.