Bedfordshire Police v Cheryldeen Shantha Liversidge [2001] EWCA Civ 1985 (11 December 2001)
Permission to appeal granted due to compelling public importance and viable legal arguments regarding Chief Constable's liability for discrimination by subordinate officers.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1985
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Bedfordshire Police; Respondent/applicant: Cheryldeen Shantha Liversidge
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Permission to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Discrimination, Statutory Torts, Liability of Chief Constable
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Bedfordshire Police
Appellant/respondent
Cheryldeen Shantha Liversidge
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Permission to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Chief Constable is liable for acts of discrimination by subordinate officers
- 2 Whether section 75(1)(b) of the Race Relations Act applies to police officers
- 3 Whether section 88 of the Police Act 1996 imposes liability for statutory torts
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal granted due to compelling public importance and viable legal arguments regarding Chief Constable's liability for discrimination by subordinate officers.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Appeal to be heard as soon as possible with a time estimate of a day and a half to two days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment