Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC v Kaye & Ors [2023] EWHC 421 (Comm) (28 February 2023)
The court found that the Individual Defendants (Kaye, Marziano, Polani) were liable in tort under Liberian law for orchestrating the DDOS attacks against Lonestar. However, Orange Liberia was not vicariously or otherwise liable for their actions under the applicable legal principles. The court determined that Lonestar was entitled to compensatory damages for proven business loss directly attributable to the DDOS attacks, but not to exemplary damages. The quantum of damages was assessed based on reliable contemporaneous evidence, not on Lonestar's overstated claims.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 421 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC; First Defendant: Daniel Kaye; Second Defendant: Avishai Marziano; Third Defendant: Cellcom Telecommunications Limited; Fourth Defendant: Ran Polani; Fifth Defendant: Orange Liberia, Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim (tort/cyber Attack/damages) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; Individual Defendants found liable in tort; Orange Liberia not liable; compensatory damages awarded; exemplary damages refused.
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Exemplary Damages, Compensatory Damages, Jurisdiction, Foreign Law (liberian Law), Cyber Attacks (ddos), Evidence (expert and Factual)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC
Claimant
Daniel Kaye
First Defendant
Avishai Marziano
Second Defendant
Cellcom Telecommunications Limited
Third Defendant
Ran Polani
Fourth Defendant
Orange Liberia, Inc
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim (tort/cyber Attack/damages) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Individual Defendants are liable in tort for orchestrating DDOS attacks against Lonestar under Liberian law
- 2 Whether Cellcom BVI and/or Orange Liberia are vicariously or otherwise liable for the actions of the Individual Defendants
- 3 What damages (compensatory and exemplary) Lonestar is entitled to recover
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Individual Defendants (Kaye, Marziano, Polani) were liable in tort under Liberian law for orchestrating the DDOS attacks against Lonestar. However, Orange Liberia was not vicariously or otherwise liable for their actions under the applicable legal principles. The court determined that Lonestar was entitled to compensatory damages for proven business loss directly attributable to the DDOS attacks, but not to exemplary damages. The quantum of damages was assessed based on reliable contemporaneous evidence, not on Lonestar's overstated claims.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; Individual Defendants found liable in tort; Orange Liberia not liable; compensatory damages awarded; exemplary damages refused.
Orders
- Judgment for Lonestar against the Individual Defendants for compensatory damages (quantum specified below)
- Claim against Orange Liberia dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment