SH v HH
The English court had no jurisdiction over SH because he was neither habitually resident nor present in England, and there was no unequivocal acceptance by the father to confer jurisdiction under Article 12(3) Brussels II Revised. The orders of Judge Cliffe were set aside and the wardship discharged.
- Parties
- Child: SH; Father/appellant: HH; Mother/respondent: (Mother, anonymised)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Wardship/family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (wardship Jurisdiction) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of Judge Cliffe set aside; wardship discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Wardship, Habitual Residence, Jurisdiction of English Courts, Brussels II Revised, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SH
Child
HH
Father/appellant
(Mother, anonymised)
Mother/respondent
Procedural Posture
Wardship/family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (wardship Jurisdiction) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court had jurisdiction over SH under habitual residence or presence
- 2 Whether the proceedings were procedurally fair and compliant with Article 6 ECHR
- 3 Whether jurisdiction could be conferred by prorogation under Article 12(3) Brussels II Revised
Ratio Decidendi
The English court had no jurisdiction over SH because he was neither habitually resident nor present in England, and there was no unequivocal acceptance by the father to confer jurisdiction under Article 12(3) Brussels II Revised. The orders of Judge Cliffe were set aside and the wardship discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of Judge Cliffe set aside; wardship discharged.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed; orders of Judge Cliffe set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment