Razaq v Iqbal & Ors
The appeal was dismissed because the judge was not satisfied on balance that the Claimant would have accepted the settlement offer if communicated, and thus the negligent conduct did not cause wasted costs. Relief from sanctions for late evidence was properly granted, and there was no breach of duty to the court established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mohammed Saqib Razaq; First Defendant: Imran Iqbal; Second Defendant/appellant: Esure Services Limited; Third Party/respondent: Dunne & Co. Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling on Wasted Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Wasted Costs, Relief From Sanctions, Solicitor's Duty to Court, Causation in Costs Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Saqib Razaq
Claimant
Imran Iqbal
First Defendant
Esure Services Limited
Second Defendant/appellant
Dunne & Co. Solicitors
Third Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling on Wasted Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitor's failure to communicate settlement offer to client constitutes breach of duty to court
- 2 Whether negligent conduct caused wasted costs
- 3 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for late evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the judge was not satisfied on balance that the Claimant would have accepted the settlement offer if communicated, and thus the negligent conduct did not cause wasted costs. Relief from sanctions for late evidence was properly granted, and there was no breach of duty to the court established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal relief from sanctions refused
- Application for wasted costs order dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment