Williams v Telefonica 02 UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 3299 (QB) (18 December 2009)
Shah Solicitors persisted with an application for a witness summons when a reasonably careful and responsible solicitor would not have done so, failing to properly instruct their expert and ignoring clear warnings and correspondence from O2. This conduct was negligent and unreasonable, justifying a wasted costs order.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 3299 (QB)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant/respondent: Ricardo Williams; Third Party/applicant: Telefonica O2 UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Trial Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for wasted costs order granted
- Legal Topics
- Wasted Costs Order, Witness Summons, Expert Evidence, Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Ricardo Williams
Defendant/respondent
Telefonica O2 UK Limited
Third Party/applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Trial Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Shah Solicitors acted negligently and unreasonably in persisting with an application for a witness summons
- 2 Whether a wasted costs order should be made against Shah Solicitors
Ratio Decidendi
Shah Solicitors persisted with an application for a witness summons when a reasonably careful and responsible solicitor would not have done so, failing to properly instruct their expert and ignoring clear warnings and correspondence from O2. This conduct was negligent and unreasonable, justifying a wasted costs order.
Court Disposition
Application for wasted costs order granted
Orders
- Costs to be paid by Shah Solicitors to O2 as wasted costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed, covering costs post-dating 17 November 2008
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment