Mach, R (on the application of) v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 645 (27 April 2001)
No loss was caused to the Treasury Solicitor by the solicitors' conduct; therefore, the requirements for a wasted costs order were not met.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 645
- Parties
- Claimant: Josef Mach; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Wasted Costs Order From High Court (administrative Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Wasted Costs Orders, Judicial Review, Solicitor Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Josef Mach
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Wasted Costs Order From High Court (administrative Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's solicitors acted unreasonably in their communication with the court regarding withdrawal of the judicial review application
- 2 Whether any loss was caused to the Treasury Solicitor by the solicitors' conduct, justifying a wasted costs order
Ratio Decidendi
No loss was caused to the Treasury Solicitor by the solicitors' conduct; therefore, the requirements for a wasted costs order were not met.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Wasted costs order of £400 against claimant's solicitor set aside
- No order as to costs of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment