B v Richard Pendelbury Associated Newspapers Ltd [2002] EWHC 1404 (QB) (28 June 2002)

B v Richard Pendelbury Associated Newspapers Ltd [2002] EWHC 1404 (QB) (28 June 2002)

The wasted costs jurisdiction is a summary remedy intended for clear cases where the facts are not in serious dispute. Where the application involves complex, disputed facts and allegations of fraud, it is inappropriate to proceed under the wasted costs procedure, as it risks injustice and would require a full trial rather than a summary process. The court should not allow the application to proceed to the show cause stage in such circumstances.

Citation
[2002] EWHC 1404
Parties
Claimant: B; First Defendant: Richard Pendelbury; Second Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 June 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Wasted Costs Order / Determination of Whether to Proceed to Show Cause Stage
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Wasted Costs Orders, Legal Professional Privilege, Summary Procedure, Solicitor's Duties, Costs in Litigation
Civil Procedure Legal Profession Wasted Costs Orders Legal Professional Privilege Summary Procedure Solicitor's Duties Costs in Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B

Claimant

Richard Pendelbury

First Defendant

Associated Newspapers Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Wasted Costs Order / Determination of Whether to Proceed to Show Cause Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the claimant's solicitor to show cause why a wasted costs order should not be made
  2. 2 Whether the wasted costs procedure is appropriate in cases involving complex and disputed facts, including allegations of fraud

Ratio Decidendi

The wasted costs jurisdiction is a summary remedy intended for clear cases where the facts are not in serious dispute. Where the application involves complex, disputed facts and allegations of fraud, it is inappropriate to proceed under the wasted costs procedure, as it risks injustice and would require a full trial rather than a summary process. The court should not allow the application to proceed to the show cause stage in such circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for a wasted costs order is not to proceed further, whether to the first or second stage.