The National Farmers' Union v Herefordshire Council & Ors [2025] EWHC 536 (Admin) (10 March 2025)
Policy W3 is lawful; the Local Planning Authority is not bound to restrict the scope of the Plan to the statutory definition of 'waste'. The exclusion for faecal matter applies only where there is certainty of use in farming without environmental harm, which cannot be assumed given evidence of river pollution. The requirement for waste management method statements and nutrient neutrality is justified for EIA development due to significant environmental impacts. Supporting text does not unlawfully extend the policy. Consultation failures did not cause substantial prejudice. Adequate reasons were provided.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 536 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: The National Farmers' Union; First Defendant: Herefordshire Council; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Intervener: River Action UK
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Waste Management, Nutrient Neutrality, Local Plan Challenge, Definition of Waste, Consultation Requirements, Planning Policy Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The National Farmers' Union
Claimant
Herefordshire Council
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Second Defendant
River Action UK
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Policy W3 unlawfully extends beyond the statutory definition of 'waste'
- 2 Lawfulness of extending policy requirements to the whole agricultural unit
- 3 Rationality of nutrient neutrality requirements
Ratio Decidendi
Policy W3 is lawful; the Local Planning Authority is not bound to restrict the scope of the Plan to the statutory definition of 'waste'. The exclusion for faecal matter applies only where there is certainty of use in farming without environmental harm, which cannot be assumed given evidence of river pollution. The requirement for waste management method statements and nutrient neutrality is justified for EIA development due to significant environmental impacts. Supporting text does not unlawfully extend the policy. Consultation failures did not cause substantial prejudice. Adequate reasons were provided.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Policy W3 of the Herefordshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan upheld
- No relief granted to claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment