Bolton School v Evans [2006] EWCA Civ 1653 (15 November 2006)
The disciplinary action and constructive dismissal were not because Mr Evans made a protected disclosure, but because of his conduct in accessing the computer system without authority. The protection for whistleblowers does not extend to acts of misconduct committed in the course of gathering evidence for a disclosure, provided the employer's genuine reason for dismissal is the misconduct.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1653
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Bolton School; Defendant/respondent: Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Whistleblowing, Constructive Dismissal, Protected Disclosure, Data Protection, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bolton School
Claimant/appellant
Evans
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disciplinary action and constructive dismissal of Mr Evans was because he made a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996, section 43A.
- 2 Whether the conduct for which Mr Evans was disciplined (unauthorised access to the computer system) was part of the protected disclosure.
Ratio Decidendi
The disciplinary action and constructive dismissal were not because Mr Evans made a protected disclosure, but because of his conduct in accessing the computer system without authority. The protection for whistleblowers does not extend to acts of misconduct committed in the course of gathering evidence for a disclosure, provided the employer's genuine reason for dismissal is the misconduct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Cross-appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment