Iliffe v James a Trafford & Anor [2001] EWHC Ch 469 (19th December, 2001)

Iliffe v James a Trafford & Anor [2001] EWHC Ch 469 (19th December, 2001)

The administrators did not fall below the standard of a reasonably competent administrator. They acted prudently in the context of complex family disputes, sought legal advice, and applied to the court for directions. There was no actionable wilful default in failing to recover rent/mesne profits or in the timing of the sale. The claim for an account on the footing of wilful default fails.

Citation
[2001] EWHC Ch 469
Parties
Claimant: Oliver Iliffe; Defendants/administrators: Wilsons (two partners, Salisbury)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Probate/trusts / Judgment After Trial of Claim for Account on Footing of Wilful Default
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Wilful Default by Administrators, Duties of Personal Representatives, Account on Footing of Wilful Default, Sale of Estate Assets, Recovery of Rent/mesne Profits, Professional Standards for Trustees
Probate Trusts and Estates Civil Procedure Wilful Default by Administrators Duties of Personal Representatives Account on Footing of Wilful Default Sale of Estate Assets Recovery of Rent/mesne Profits +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oliver Iliffe

Claimant

Wilsons (two partners, Salisbury)

Defendants/administrators

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Probate/trusts / Judgment After Trial of Claim for Account on Footing of Wilful Default

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the administrators were guilty of wilful default in failing to get in/preserve estate property and account for income
  2. 2 Whether administrators failed to recover rent/mesne profits for estate land
  3. 3 Whether administrators failed to sell estate land in a timely manner

Ratio Decidendi

The administrators did not fall below the standard of a reasonably competent administrator. They acted prudently in the context of complex family disputes, sought legal advice, and applied to the court for directions. There was no actionable wilful default in failing to recover rent/mesne profits or in the timing of the sale. The claim for an account on the footing of wilful default fails.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for account on footing of wilful default dismissed
  • No order for administration of the estate