Bluebridge Ltd v S Kelly (Building Contractors) Ltd
The judge was entitled to find that SKBC had a bona fide defence on substantial grounds to the petition debt, and it was inappropriate for the dispute to be resolved through winding up proceedings. The application for permission to appeal was dismissed as there was no real prospect of success.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Bluebridge Limited; Defendant/respondent: S Kelly (Building Contractors) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up Petition, Statutory Demand, Rent Arrears, Abuse of Process, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bluebridge Limited
Claimant/applicant
S Kelly (Building Contractors) Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SKBC owed rent arrears to Bluebridge justifying a winding up petition
- 2 Whether the winding up process was being used as an abuse of process
- 3 Whether SKBC had a bona fide defence on substantial grounds to the petition debt
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find that SKBC had a bona fide defence on substantial grounds to the petition debt, and it was inappropriate for the dispute to be resolved through winding up proceedings. The application for permission to appeal was dismissed as there was no real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Costs order of £7,000 in favour of SKBC upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment