Sternberg Reed Solicitors v Andrew Paul Harrison
The arbitrator was entitled to consider the 12 November 2015 offer, as it was not expressly marked 'without prejudice', when determining costs. The arbitrator did not err in law or fail to exercise his discretion in concluding that neither party was an outright winner and ordering each to bear their own costs. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Sternberg Reed Solicitors; Defendant/respondent: Andrew Paul Harrison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Appeal (costs) / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Costs Award
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Without Prejudice Rule, Costs in Arbitration, Admissibility of Settlement Offers, Appeal on Point of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sternberg Reed Solicitors
Claimant/appellant
Andrew Paul Harrison
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal (costs) / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Costs Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator erred in law by admitting 'without prejudice' correspondence as evidence on costs
- 2 Whether the arbitrator correctly construed the status of the settlement offers
- 3 Whether the arbitrator misdirected himself in holding that there was no outright winner
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitrator was entitled to consider the 12 November 2015 offer, as it was not expressly marked 'without prejudice', when determining costs. The arbitrator did not err in law or fail to exercise his discretion in concluding that neither party was an outright winner and ordering each to bear their own costs. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendant awarded costs of the appeal, summarily assessed at £9,417.40, payable within 14 days
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment