Silcott v Commissioner of The Police for the Metropolis [1996] EWCA Civ 1311 (24 May 1996)
Witness immunity bars civil actions for conspiracy to pervert justice and misfeasance in public office arising from alleged fabrication of evidence by police officers, as such acts are part of the investigatory and preparatory process; only malicious prosecution claims are permitted.
- Citation
- [1996] EWCA Civ 1311
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Winston Emmanuel Silcott; Respondent/respondent: Commissioner of the Police for the Metropolis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Striking Out Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Witness Immunity, Misfeasance in Public Office, Conspiracy to Pervert Justice, Malicious Prosecution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Winston Emmanuel Silcott
Plaintiff/appellant
Commissioner of the Police for the Metropolis
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Striking Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police officers' alleged fabrication of evidence is protected by absolute immunity from civil actions for conspiracy to pervert justice or misfeasance in public office
- 2 Scope of witness immunity in civil proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Witness immunity bars civil actions for conspiracy to pervert justice and misfeasance in public office arising from alleged fabrication of evidence by police officers, as such acts are part of the investigatory and preparatory process; only malicious prosecution claims are permitted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal aid taxation of plaintiff's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment