Crawford v Jenkins
The defendant's statements to the police are protected by witness immunity, precluding claims for false imprisonment and harassment based on those statements. No court process was involved, so the exception for malicious abuse of process does not apply. The two text messages, even if constituting a course of conduct, are not capable of amounting to harassment.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Lincoln Crawford; Respondent/defendant: Bronwen Jenkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Witness Immunity, False Imprisonment, Harassment, Malicious Prosecution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lincoln Crawford
Appellant/claimant
Bronwen Jenkins
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's complaint to the police is protected by witness immunity from suit for false imprisonment and harassment
- 2 Whether a claim under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 can be based on statements to the police
- 3 Whether two text messages can constitute harassment under the 1997 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's statements to the police are protected by witness immunity, precluding claims for false imprisonment and harassment based on those statements. No court process was involved, so the exception for malicious abuse of process does not apply. The two text messages, even if constituting a course of conduct, are not capable of amounting to harassment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment