D (Aged 2), In the Matter Of [2023] EWFC 333 (10 November 2023)
The court refused A's applications for parental responsibility, change of name, declaration of parentage, and direct contact, finding these were not in D's best interests due to the risk of emotional harm, conflict, and A's controlling behaviour. The court granted C a live with order and parental responsibility, recognising her role as a primary caregiver. An order for indirect (letterbox) contact was made. A section 91(14) order was granted to prevent A from making further applications without leave until D turns 16.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 333
- Parties
- Applicant: A; First Respondent: B; Second Respondent: C; Third Respondent: D (by a Children's Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Court Children Act 1989 Proceedings / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Welfare Hearings
- Outcome
- A's applications for parental responsibility, change of name, declaration of parentage, and direct contact are refused. C is granted a live with order and parental responsibility. Indirect contact (annual letter/card) is ordered. A section 91(14) order is made against A until D is 16.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements Order, Declaration of Parentage, Change of Name, Section 91(14) Order, Indirect Contact, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
B
First Respondent
C
Second Respondent
D (by a Children's Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Court Children Act 1989 Proceedings / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Welfare Hearings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether C should be granted parental responsibility and a live with order for D
- 2 Whether A should be granted parental responsibility for D
- 3 Whether D's name should be changed to include A's chosen names
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused A's applications for parental responsibility, change of name, declaration of parentage, and direct contact, finding these were not in D's best interests due to the risk of emotional harm, conflict, and A's controlling behaviour. The court granted C a live with order and parental responsibility, recognising her role as a primary caregiver. An order for indirect (letterbox) contact was made. A section 91(14) order was granted to prevent A from making further applications without leave until D turns 16.
Court Disposition
A's applications for parental responsibility, change of name, declaration of parentage, and direct contact are refused. C is granted a live with order and parental responsibility. Indirect contact (annual letter/card) is ordered. A section 91(14) order is made against A until D is 16.
Orders
- Live with order in favour of B and C reflecting current arrangements
- Parental responsibility order in favour of C
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment