A v B Local Authority & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 766 (19 July 2016)
By majority, the Court of Appeal held that the Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that the appellant's association with a convicted sex offender posed a risk to children at the school, creating a duty to disclose the relationship to the governing body. The failure to disclose constituted misconduct, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 766
- Parties
- Appellant: A; First Respondent: B local authority; Second Respondent: C governing body of school
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed by majority; dismissal found to be fair as a matter of substance.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Gross Misconduct, Safeguarding Duties, Duty of Disclosure, Article 8 ECHR, Contributory Fault, Polkey Reduction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Appellant
B local authority
First Respondent
C governing body of school
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant head teacher was under a duty to disclose her relationship with a convicted sex offender to the school governing body
- 2 Whether failure to disclose constituted gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal
- 3 Whether the dismissal was fair as a matter of substance under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
By majority, the Court of Appeal held that the Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that the appellant's association with a convicted sex offender posed a risk to children at the school, creating a duty to disclose the relationship to the governing body. The failure to disclose constituted misconduct, and the decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer. Any interference with Article 8 rights was justified and proportionate for the protection of children. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed by majority; dismissal found to be fair as a matter of substance.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order for compensation; Employment Tribunal's findings on contributory fault and Polkey reduction stand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment