A Chief Constable & Anor v YK & Ors [2010] EWHC 3282 (Fam) (14 December 2010)
The court approved a consent order discharging the proceedings after being satisfied, through independent expert evidence, that the protected person genuinely wished to regularise her marriage and no longer required the protection order, subject to injunctive relief remaining for two years.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 3282 (Fam)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: A Chief Constable; Plaintiff: AA; Defendant: YK; Defendant: Ayesha Hasan; Defendant: Ami Bartholomew; Defendant: Jennifer Barker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Forced Marriage Protection / Post Judgment Addendum Following Consent Order
- Outcome
- Consent order approved; proceedings concluded
- Legal Topics
- Forced Marriage, Injunctive Relief, Protection Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Chief Constable
Plaintiff
AA
Plaintiff
YK
Defendant
Ayesha Hasan
Defendant
Ami Bartholomew
Defendant
Jennifer Barker
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Forced Marriage Protection / Post Judgment Addendum Following Consent Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should discharge or maintain protective orders in a forced marriage case involving an adult
- 2 How the court should ascertain the wishes and feelings of the protected person
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved a consent order discharging the proceedings after being satisfied, through independent expert evidence, that the protected person genuinely wished to regularise her marriage and no longer required the protection order, subject to injunctive relief remaining for two years.
Court Disposition
Consent order approved; proceedings concluded
Orders
- Injunctive relief to remain in place for two years
- Proceedings brought to an end by consent order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment