AB & Ors, Re
The Court of Protection retains jurisdiction to make limited orders to locate AB, a vulnerable adult, following her wrongful removal to Jamaica, and it is proportionate to stay proceedings pending further application, given AB’s welfare has been ascertained and the applicant is pursuing remedies in Jamaica.
- Parties
- Applicant: A County Council; First Respondent: AB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor); Second Respondent: Mrs O; Third Respondent: Mr O
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Welfare Application / Stay of Proceedings Pending Further Application
- Outcome
- Proceedings stayed with permission to apply to lift stay; if no application within six months, proceedings dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Habitual Residence, Jurisdiction, Third Party Disclosure Orders, Contempt of Court, Return Orders, Protective Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A County Council
Applicant
AB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
First Respondent
Mrs O
Second Respondent
Mr O
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Welfare Application / Stay of Proceedings Pending Further Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Protection retains jurisdiction over AB after her removal to Jamaica
- 2 Whether AB remains habitually resident in England and Wales
- 3 Appropriateness of third party disclosure orders to locate a vulnerable adult
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Protection retains jurisdiction to make limited orders to locate AB, a vulnerable adult, following her wrongful removal to Jamaica, and it is proportionate to stay proceedings pending further application, given AB’s welfare has been ascertained and the applicant is pursuing remedies in Jamaica.
Court Disposition
Proceedings stayed with permission to apply to lift stay; if no application within six months, proceedings dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
- Permission granted to file COP9 application to lift stay and seek further directions or orders.
- If no COP9 application filed within six months, proceedings dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment