A v A

A v A

The trusts are not shams as the current trustees acted independently and in good faith; assets held by trusts are not available to the husband beyond his minority shareholding; allegations of cash skimming and business diversion were not proven; HDC shares and other matrimonial assets are to be divided equally between husband and wife.

Parties
Petitioner: A; Respondent: A; Interveners: St George Trustees Limited and others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief / Final Judgment
Outcome
Ancillary relief granted; assets divided equally.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Ancillary Relief, Trusts, Sham Trusts, Division of Matrimonial Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 30 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Petitioner

A

Respondent

St George Trustees Limited and others

Interveners

Procedural Posture

Ancillary Relief / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trusts are shams and assets held therein should be treated as belonging to the husband
  2. 2 Whether assets held by trusts are available to the husband under Thomas v Thomas principle
  3. 3 Whether the husband skimmed cash from HDC

Ratio Decidendi

The trusts are not shams as the current trustees acted independently and in good faith; assets held by trusts are not available to the husband beyond his minority shareholding; allegations of cash skimming and business diversion were not proven; HDC shares and other matrimonial assets are to be divided equally between husband and wife.

Court Disposition

Ancillary relief granted; assets divided equally.

Orders

  • HDC to acquire wife's shares at market value (£689,400)
  • Wife to receive contents of Drum Grange, jewellery, car, and her share of proceeds of Drum Grange